We know that the jacket was knitted in 'W B Kwiknit Astrakhan Wool' - helpfully, it has a ticket from one of the skeins attached to it. I recognised 'Kwiknit' as a brand name of William Briggs & Co. from the 1930s, because I have seen it on pattern leaflets.
It would normally, of course, be very odd to leave a paper ticket (or nowadays a ball-band) attached to something you have knitted, but we discovered from the records that the jacket was knitted as a replica, specifically for the collection - it has never been worn, and the ticket was attached as an easy way to keep the yarn information with the garment.
I don't know how 'Astrakhan wool' was made - was the original fleece curly, or was the curl introduced in processing it?
I looked through William Briggs leaflets that we have in the collection from the 1930s, and found the jacket pattern too.
Penelope 902 |
So the garment was knitted quite recently, although the yarn and the pattern have both survived from the 1930s.
I don't think that the short-sleeved option illustrated on the leaflet would have been very successful. The sleeves look too big and a bit shapeless, whereas in the long-sleeved version, the slightly puffed sleeve caps are balanced by the close-fitting lower sleeves. And the astrakhan yarn is very thick, warm and heavy - not suitable for wear with a tennis outfit, I think.
While looking for the pattern, I found another tennis jacket which I think is a much more practical design, and very stylish. It's also in Kwiknit, but the plain smooth wool, rather than the Astrakhan. I think it would be much lighter to wear - the Astrakhan jacket is surprisingly heavy. (I should check the weights given in the two leaflets when I can access the leaflets again.)
Penelope 890 |
In the Guild collection, we have very few knitted pieces in wool from the 1930s - I think most of them would have been worn into holes, or unravelled and reknitted, during the long period of clothes rationing in the Second World War. It's amazing that a jacket's worth of Astrakhan wool somehow survived unused though that time too. So although it's a replica and not a 1930s original, we are very pleased to have it.
No comments:
Post a Comment