Last weekend a group of us from the Knitting & Crochet Guild in Huddersfield had our second knitting weekend in Blackpool. As last year, we stayed at Paula Chew's Westcliffe Hotel We ran our own workshops again - this year we looked at three varieties of lace knitting. On Saturday morning, Marie did a workshop on Orenburg lace, following on from the talk she did in May. She knitted several samples to illustrate her talk, and the aim was that we should all knit a similar sample in Blackpool.
I soon found that the yarn I had taken with me wasn't suitable, so I bought a skein of Susan Crawford's Fenella in the shop in the hotel. The colour is called Columbine, a very pale mauve. So here's my finished Orenburg sample in Columbine. (The colour isn't very accurate, I'm afraid.)
Here's how you knit an Orenburg shawl: you knit a strip of lace as the bottom border first, and then pick stitches along its top edge and the cast on edge. Then you knit the side borders and the centre at the same time, from side to side. Then you knit the top border, incorporating one of the centre stitches at the end of every alternate row. Finally, you join the top border and left edge border with Russian grafting. (That's a very brief outline...) Our samples were designed to be like miniature shawls. In my sample, the cast-on edge is bottom right, and the Russian grafting is at top left, or at least I think it's that way round. Russian grafting is very neat, and it's hard to see where it is, after you have sewn the ends in.
On Saturday afternoon, we looked at Print o' the Wave, to represent Shetland lace knitting. I had knitted swatches of several versions, including the one published by Jane Gaugain in 1842, that I wrote about here. The aim of the workshop was to knit a swatch of a modern version of the pattern. Everybody managed that, with at least two pattern repeats so that you can see how the design develops. But I think that no-one attempted the Elaborated Print o' the Wave, from Sharon Miller's Heirloom Knitting.
Several people preferred the 'ordinary' Print o' the Wave anyway, and the Elaborated pattern is harder to follow because it has a 36-row repeat rather than a 12-row repeat. I like both of them.
And finally on Sunday morning, Ann did an Estonian lace workshop. She gave us a chart for Lilac Leaf Lace, with nupps. Nupps are a form of bobble common in Estonian lace and quite tricky to do: first you make 7 stitches out of one, and on the next row, purl all 7 together. Keeping the stitches loose enough to be able to purl them all together is the tricky part, but Ann gave us a demonstration first. And all sitting together around Paula's dining table was a good way to learn - everyone else was finding it hard, but getting better, so that was really encouraging. And Val had a very bright idea to keep the stitches loose, which helped a lot.
I did just a small sample - one and a half repeats, which gives two complete lilac leaves. (I didn't do a border at the sides, so they are not very neat, and I have cropped them.) I'm still not sure I like nupps much, but at least now I know that I can do them. And I do have a plan to try them again.
On Sunday afternoon, we came home. It was a really good weekend - Paula looked after us very well. She has been running knitting holidays at the Westcliffe for 10 years, very successfully, which is a great achievement - congratulations to Paula.
Just to prove that we were indeed beside the sea, here's a view towards Blackpool Tower and the pier, taken early on Sunday morning from the end of King Edward Avenue.
Mostly about knitting history. Sometimes about what I'm knitting. Sometimes about other things too.
Friday, 28 October 2016
Friday, 21 October 2016
Canadian Knits
Yesterday evening, I did a combination talk/trunk show on Canadian Knits for the Huddersfield Knitting & Crochet Guild branch. Not all Canadian knits everywhere, ever, obviously, but focussing on Cowichan and Mary Maxim sweaters.
We have three sweaters in the Guild collection that came from the Coats archive, and I think must have been bought in British Columbia around 1950. One is definitely a Cowichan sweater, and has a label to prove it.
I really like this one - it's soft and has an interestingly nubbly texture. Like all Cowichan sweaters, it's hand-knitted from handspun wool, in natural colours. Also like all Cowichan sweaters, it is made without seams: knitted back and forth, probably on several straight needles, up to the armholes, fronts and back then knitted separately, and knitted together at the shoulder. The sleeve stitches are picked up around the armholes, and the sleeves knitted downwards to the cuff. The stitches for the shawl collar are picked up around the neck opening. And following the Cowichan tradition, the colour not in use is woven in, rather than being stranded across on the wrong side as in Fair Isle knits.
Another Canadian sweater is also I'm sure Cowichan, though there is no label to say so in this case.
I like the deer (elk?) and pine tree design, but the fit is a bit odd on this one - it's very long, and very narrow around the bottom edge.
These sweaters were probably acquired by Patons & Baldwins as possible inspiration for their own designs, presumably under the direction of James Norbury who was the P&B chief designer at the time. James Norbury also had a BBC TV series on knitting, in the 1950s, and BBC Radio 4 included a still from one of his programmes (at least I assume that's what it is) in March this year.
And it shows the Guild's sweater! (I tried to get more information from the BBC, but didn't get a reply.)
In 1953, Patons & Baldwins issued a pattern based on the sweater, in a booklet of Moorland Handknits, calling it a "North American Indian coat".
Moorland was a DK weight wool, so to get it thick enough, the pattern specified using three strands together. (Later on, about 1960, when Patons started to sell a chunky yarn, the pattern was re-issued.)
Our third sweater from British Columbia was made by a Semiahmoo knitter - the Semiahmoo, like the Cowichans, are Coast Salish people.
It's interesting that this one uses dyed yarn (the green and possibly the black). But it doesn't feel as nice as the others - it's very stiff and a bit harsh.
I'll maybe say something about Mary Maxim another time. But now I'm off to Blackpool!
We have three sweaters in the Guild collection that came from the Coats archive, and I think must have been bought in British Columbia around 1950. One is definitely a Cowichan sweater, and has a label to prove it.
I really like this one - it's soft and has an interestingly nubbly texture. Like all Cowichan sweaters, it's hand-knitted from handspun wool, in natural colours. Also like all Cowichan sweaters, it is made without seams: knitted back and forth, probably on several straight needles, up to the armholes, fronts and back then knitted separately, and knitted together at the shoulder. The sleeve stitches are picked up around the armholes, and the sleeves knitted downwards to the cuff. The stitches for the shawl collar are picked up around the neck opening. And following the Cowichan tradition, the colour not in use is woven in, rather than being stranded across on the wrong side as in Fair Isle knits.
Another Canadian sweater is also I'm sure Cowichan, though there is no label to say so in this case.
I like the deer (elk?) and pine tree design, but the fit is a bit odd on this one - it's very long, and very narrow around the bottom edge.
These sweaters were probably acquired by Patons & Baldwins as possible inspiration for their own designs, presumably under the direction of James Norbury who was the P&B chief designer at the time. James Norbury also had a BBC TV series on knitting, in the 1950s, and BBC Radio 4 included a still from one of his programmes (at least I assume that's what it is) in March this year.
And it shows the Guild's sweater! (I tried to get more information from the BBC, but didn't get a reply.)
In 1953, Patons & Baldwins issued a pattern based on the sweater, in a booklet of Moorland Handknits, calling it a "North American Indian coat".
Moorland was a DK weight wool, so to get it thick enough, the pattern specified using three strands together. (Later on, about 1960, when Patons started to sell a chunky yarn, the pattern was re-issued.)
Our third sweater from British Columbia was made by a Semiahmoo knitter - the Semiahmoo, like the Cowichans, are Coast Salish people.
It's interesting that this one uses dyed yarn (the green and possibly the black). But it doesn't feel as nice as the others - it's very stiff and a bit harsh.
I'll maybe say something about Mary Maxim another time. But now I'm off to Blackpool!
Wednesday, 19 October 2016
Print o' the Wave, But Not Quite
As I said in a recent post about the Print o' the Wave lace pattern, I've been researching its history, and along the way I've been looking out for examples of it in use, outside Shetland. I haven't found many, so far, but I did spot a few from the 1930s and 1940s, from the Patons archive.
In fact, they aren't quite the standard Print o' the Wave pattern as used in Shetland. As well as the zizag openwork panels and the part that I think of as seaweed fronds, there is another panel of plain stocking stitch, which is pulled into a zigzag by the rest of the pattern. I should I suppose knit a swatch, but instead, here is a close-up from a another pattern I found - for a twinset, in Woman magazine from 1948.
(I spent a day at the British library recently, reading copies of Woman and Woman and Home from the 1940s. Fascinating! I'll write some blog posts about it. Some time.)
Back to the 1930s. The Lady's Jumper (the design is called Brenda) has a square neck - a good choice for a complicated lace pattern like Print o' the Wave. It could be difficult to make a round neck look neat, when you have to fit the decreases into the lace pattern. The sleeves have a long ribbed cuff, then there's an increase row, and then you knit straight to the top of the sleeve, That's a common 30s sleeve shape (by which I really mean I've seen another one like it, to be honest...) but also it avoids having to fit sleeve increases into the lace pattern. There is shaping at the top of the sleeve, but the pattern tells you how to do that, row by row, rather than just leaving it to the knitter.
The other pattern is a little girl's dress ('Joan' design - a very 1930s name), with the same variant of Print o' the Wave. The skirt is just two straight pieces of lace, followed by a lot of decreasing to gather the skirt onto the bodice, which is in moss stitch. It's a very pretty dress.
And here's a leaflet from the 1940s that also features a stitch pattern similar to Print o' the Wave, though this looks less like the standard Shetland version. The 'seaweed frond' part of the pattern is much wider than in Print o' the Wave, and is in reverse stocking stitch instead of stocking stitch - the overall effect is very different, and not really as nice as Print o' the Wave, I think.
I have been assuming that the lace patterns in these designs were based on the Shetland Print o' the Wave stitch, but I suppose it might not have been. Because where did Print o' the Wave come from? A friend showed me Nancy Bush's book on Estonian knitting last week, and there are several stitch patterns there that are like Print o' the Wave - the names all seem to have 'twig pattern' in the title (but in Estonian, obviously). Here's a link to a free pattern for an Estonian lace shawl that has a twig pattern in it - and it does look similar to Print o' the Wave, with added nupps. So perhaps the Patons & Baldwins designer got the idea from a Shetland shawl, or perhaps it came from a different tradition altogether. I don't know.
In fact, they aren't quite the standard Print o' the Wave pattern as used in Shetland. As well as the zizag openwork panels and the part that I think of as seaweed fronds, there is another panel of plain stocking stitch, which is pulled into a zigzag by the rest of the pattern. I should I suppose knit a swatch, but instead, here is a close-up from a another pattern I found - for a twinset, in Woman magazine from 1948.
(I spent a day at the British library recently, reading copies of Woman and Woman and Home from the 1940s. Fascinating! I'll write some blog posts about it. Some time.)
Back to the 1930s. The Lady's Jumper (the design is called Brenda) has a square neck - a good choice for a complicated lace pattern like Print o' the Wave. It could be difficult to make a round neck look neat, when you have to fit the decreases into the lace pattern. The sleeves have a long ribbed cuff, then there's an increase row, and then you knit straight to the top of the sleeve, That's a common 30s sleeve shape (by which I really mean I've seen another one like it, to be honest...) but also it avoids having to fit sleeve increases into the lace pattern. There is shaping at the top of the sleeve, but the pattern tells you how to do that, row by row, rather than just leaving it to the knitter.
Patons Helps to Knitters 332 |
The other pattern is a little girl's dress ('Joan' design - a very 1930s name), with the same variant of Print o' the Wave. The skirt is just two straight pieces of lace, followed by a lot of decreasing to gather the skirt onto the bodice, which is in moss stitch. It's a very pretty dress.
Patons Helps to Knitters 2/485 |
And here's a leaflet from the 1940s that also features a stitch pattern similar to Print o' the Wave, though this looks less like the standard Shetland version. The 'seaweed frond' part of the pattern is much wider than in Print o' the Wave, and is in reverse stocking stitch instead of stocking stitch - the overall effect is very different, and not really as nice as Print o' the Wave, I think.
Patons 968 |
I have been assuming that the lace patterns in these designs were based on the Shetland Print o' the Wave stitch, but I suppose it might not have been. Because where did Print o' the Wave come from? A friend showed me Nancy Bush's book on Estonian knitting last week, and there are several stitch patterns there that are like Print o' the Wave - the names all seem to have 'twig pattern' in the title (but in Estonian, obviously). Here's a link to a free pattern for an Estonian lace shawl that has a twig pattern in it - and it does look similar to Print o' the Wave, with added nupps. So perhaps the Patons & Baldwins designer got the idea from a Shetland shawl, or perhaps it came from a different tradition altogether. I don't know.
Monday, 17 October 2016
Leeds Print Workshop
On Friday, we went to the opening party for the Leeds Print Workshop, on Vicar Lane. Our daughter is one of the founder members, so we've known about it from the very beginning. A good party - lots of people there, good beer, a tombola (I won a bracelet)... It was impressive to see how much equipment they have already got, mostly donated.
They are still fund-raising to buy more equipment. On Friday there was a display of the prints available as perks to donors.
We have already made a donation, and our perk is the second from the left -- 'In the 50s' by Kirstie Williams. I love it - it does remind me very much of 1950s furnishing fabric, and the colours are just right.
The first programme of workshops starts this week, running on Saturdays (including two bookbinding workshops, tutored by our daughter).
It's a very impressive start, and I'm sure the Print Workshop will flourish.
A nice article about the workshop, with a photo of the outside of the building, is here. And just to show that print-making is a messy business, here are some aprons, hanging on the workshop wall.
Saturday, 15 October 2016
Mice in Blackpool
Last October, a group of us from the Knitting & Crochet Guild in Huddersfield went to the Westcliffe Hotel in Blackpool for a Knitaway weekend. We had a wonderful time, and immediately decided that we should have another weekend away this year. (Chris Evans interviewed Paula Chew, the owner of the Westcliffe, on his Breakfast Show this week - you can catch it here for another few weeks.)
More people wanted to go this year, so to fit everyone in, we are having two weekends at the Westcliffe, The first was two weeks ago, and I'm in the second group, going next weekend.
As last year, we are running workshops ourselves, this time on lace knitting Elizabeth Smith, who went on the first weekend did some practising beforehand and made some little mice, wearing lace dresses. Elizabeth is a very creative knitter - she did a workshop on knitting seaweed for the Huddersfield KCG branch last year. Her mice are in Jamieson's Spindrift, about 3 inches high (about 7 cm,) and are very mousey. Their dresses are knitted in Rowan Kid Silk Haze, and are in the three lace traditions of our Blackpool workshops: Shetland, Estonian and Orenburg. (The Orenburg lace dress is in the mouse paw pattern - Elizabeth says that she was thinking of using the cat's paw pattern until she realised that it wouldn't be appropriate.) And as you might be able to see, the dresses are trimmed with beads - very splendid gowns for tiny mice. They are altogether adorable.
Thursday, 13 October 2016
Print o' the Wave
Swatch of Print o' the Wave, from The Lady's Assistant by Mrs Gaugain |
I'm doing a workshop on the Shetland lace pattern, Print o' the Wave, next week, and so I've been looking into its history. I first saw the pattern at the In the Loop conference in Winchester in 2012, when someone showed a photo of a garden fence on Shetland knitted in garden twine, I think, in Print o' the Wave - it looked wonderful. (I wanted to buy some twine immediately to knit one too.)
I wrote earlier about the Shetland Museum's Study Day on “Authenticity in 'Shetland'Lace Knitting”. Part of the
project looked at 19th century knitting patterns that claimed to be
based on Shetland lace patterns. The
online material on the project says “Edinburgh-based Jane Gaugain published the
earliest knitting books in Victorian Britain.
Her patterns are also the most authentically Shetland.”
The Print o’ the Wave pattern appears in Mrs Gaugain’s 1842 book, The Lady’s Assistant in Knitting, Netting,
and Crochet Work, 2nd vol. in “Pattern XXIV, Handsome Square
Knit Shawl, of a Thin Lace-Like Fabric”.
The book is available online from the Winchester School of Art library here,
Mrs Gaugain says of this pattern “This Shawl is exactly in appearance
like the Shetland Shawls, only the centre stitch is more novel than any of them
I have ever seen” - the centre stitch is Print o’ the Wave. Her instructions specify that alternate
(wrong side) rows are purled, but she goes on to say “all the pearl rows, like
the Shetland Shawls, may be worked as plain rows”, i.e. you can knit the wrong
side rows rather than purling them. It’s
not clear whether the version with knit rows instead of purl rows already existed
as a Shetland lace pattern - she claims that the version she is presenting is novel, but there may already have been a similar stitch used by Shetland knitters.
When I first looked at her pattern, I could not understand how anyone could look at it and identify Print o' the Wave - there is no illustration in the book. But then I found another volume in the Winchester School of Art library, an Accompaniment to The Lady's Assistant, published in 1845, with illustrations of the patterns. It had an illustration of the shawl that shows the Print o' the Wave pattern clearly (even though it's printed upside-down).
The shawl has a 52-row border to begin with (shown at the top of the illustration), and Print o' the Wave then starts in row 53, with a different pattern at each side.
The shawl has a 52-row border to begin with (shown at the top of the illustration), and Print o' the Wave then starts in row 53, with a different pattern at each side.
It's not easy to disentangle Print o' the Wave pattern from these instructions. The abbreviations are not the problem, though they look a bit intimidating - you just have to translate P (for Plain) as knit, T (for Take in) as knit 2 together, and O (for Over) as yarn over. But you have to figure out which are the edge stitches and where Print o' the Wave begins (and ends). After some puzzling, I managed to extract the relevant part of the pattern and knit a swatch (see above).
The only difference between Mrs Gaugain's Print o' the Wave and modern versions is that all her decreases are done by 'T' or knit 2 together, i.e. a right-leaning decrease. These days, the pattern is made more symmetrical by using right- or left-leaning decreases as appropriate. (Though actually the difference is not as obvious as I expected.) It must have been her deliberate choice to use the same decrease throughout the pattern, because else where in the book she uses both kinds of decrease. Probably she just used knit 2 together because that was what Shetland knitters were doing at the time.
The only difference between Mrs Gaugain's Print o' the Wave and modern versions is that all her decreases are done by 'T' or knit 2 together, i.e. a right-leaning decrease. These days, the pattern is made more symmetrical by using right- or left-leaning decreases as appropriate. (Though actually the difference is not as obvious as I expected.) It must have been her deliberate choice to use the same decrease throughout the pattern, because else where in the book she uses both kinds of decrease. Probably she just used knit 2 together because that was what Shetland knitters were doing at the time.
I found a later published version of Print o' the Wave from the 1880s in Mrs Leach's Fancy Work Basket. (We have a copy in the Knitting & Crochet Guild collection, though it's also available online.) The pattern there is called "Leaf and Trellis Pattern for Curtains". Like Mrs Gaugain's pattern, all the decreases are done by knitting 2 together, so quite possibly, it was based directly on her book. (Though it doesn't of course credit her, or mention Shetland.)
Again, the illustration is upside down. But what's especially notable about it is that the sample is full of mistakes. It's recognisably Print o' the Wave, but with extra holes added. I think the instructions might be correct (I haven't checked) because the mistakes are random. It's atrocious. You'd think that someone could knit a small swatch for publication without mistakes - it wouldn't encourage a reader to knit a whole curtain otherwise. But Mrs Leach obviously needed a lot of material to fill her magazine, and this pattern is only a few column inches, so perhaps there wasn't time to worry too much about accuracy.
Mrs Gaugain did not call the pattern Print o' the Wave. (She didn't call it anything.) But I guess that the pattern continued to be used by Shetland knitters, and it acquired the name at some time. I don't know when, but certainly it was certainly before 1938, when it was named and illustrated in Mary Thomas’s Knitting Book. It is claimed there to be one of only ten ‘truly native’ Shetland patterns. (The others include Old Shale.)
I've now knitted several swatches of different versions of Print o' the Wave for the workshop, and I still think it is a beautiful pattern. I'll have to knit something larger than a swatch next.
Monday, 10 October 2016
Naples
I haven't written anything for a while, because we've been on holiday in Naples. Actually, we got back over a week ago but it takes me some time to get myself back on track after a holiday.
The plan was to visit Pompeii, Herculaneum and other Roman sites from Naples, by train, and that worked out very well. We started with a day in the Archaeology Museum in Naples, where a lot of the finds from Pompeii and Herculaneum are kept - frescoes, mosaics, statues, .....
Here's a beautiful bronze statue of Diana as an archer, from Pompeii. (I haven't shown the whole thing, because her left hand, holding the bow, is missing, and the gaping hole in her forearm grabs your attention. If you can't see that her hand is missing, she looks as good as new, I think.)
Then we went to Pompeii itself. There were crowds of people, but it's such a large site that it's easy to find quiet corners.
Here's a street sign. The "REG VII INS IV" is modern, but the two men carrying an amphora is original - perhaps ancient Pompeiians gave directions like "Turn left at the amphora carriers."
A lot of the frescos have been removed from the walls where they were found and moved to the museum, but some are still in situ, like this one in the House of Julius Polybius.
We went to one of the cemeteries outside the city walls (because of John's interest in cemeteries of all kinds). Here's a family mausoleum, with some of the portrait busts of the people buried there, still in their niches.
On another day we went to Herculaneum (modern Ercolano). The upper floors of many buildings have survived there, and some of the wooden structures on the upper floor that project over the street. Here's one of the streets, with a colonnade either side. The buildings at the top are in the modern town, so you can see the thickness of the lava that buried the ancient buildings - and of course the people of Herculaneum.
Even better in some ways, because less familiar, was Paestum, about 100km. south of Naples. I knew that it has three wonderful Greek temples, roofless but otherwise fairly complete. The stone is a beautiful golden colour.
But there was a complete town as well as the temples, now mostly just small walls, and the objects that were found there are now in a museum, next to the site. It has some wonderful things, including a collection of stone tomb panels, two rectangular panels and two gable ends for each tomb, all painted with scenes of banquets, chariot races, mourning, and so on. They are beautifully drawn, and the colours look so fresh.
We spent time in Naples, too - a favourite site was the cloister of Santa Chiara, which has tiled columns and tiled benches alongside the paths, with scenes of rural life that are very charming.
It is a cool, peaceful oasis away from the busy traffic of the city centre.
The weather was perfect - sunny, warm but not too hot. And we had some very good meals - some pizzas, of course, but also very good fish. A great holiday.
The plan was to visit Pompeii, Herculaneum and other Roman sites from Naples, by train, and that worked out very well. We started with a day in the Archaeology Museum in Naples, where a lot of the finds from Pompeii and Herculaneum are kept - frescoes, mosaics, statues, .....
Here's a beautiful bronze statue of Diana as an archer, from Pompeii. (I haven't shown the whole thing, because her left hand, holding the bow, is missing, and the gaping hole in her forearm grabs your attention. If you can't see that her hand is missing, she looks as good as new, I think.)
Then we went to Pompeii itself. There were crowds of people, but it's such a large site that it's easy to find quiet corners.
Here's a street sign. The "REG VII INS IV" is modern, but the two men carrying an amphora is original - perhaps ancient Pompeiians gave directions like "Turn left at the amphora carriers."
A lot of the frescos have been removed from the walls where they were found and moved to the museum, but some are still in situ, like this one in the House of Julius Polybius.
We went to one of the cemeteries outside the city walls (because of John's interest in cemeteries of all kinds). Here's a family mausoleum, with some of the portrait busts of the people buried there, still in their niches.
On another day we went to Herculaneum (modern Ercolano). The upper floors of many buildings have survived there, and some of the wooden structures on the upper floor that project over the street. Here's one of the streets, with a colonnade either side. The buildings at the top are in the modern town, so you can see the thickness of the lava that buried the ancient buildings - and of course the people of Herculaneum.
Even better in some ways, because less familiar, was Paestum, about 100km. south of Naples. I knew that it has three wonderful Greek temples, roofless but otherwise fairly complete. The stone is a beautiful golden colour.
But there was a complete town as well as the temples, now mostly just small walls, and the objects that were found there are now in a museum, next to the site. It has some wonderful things, including a collection of stone tomb panels, two rectangular panels and two gable ends for each tomb, all painted with scenes of banquets, chariot races, mourning, and so on. They are beautifully drawn, and the colours look so fresh.
We spent time in Naples, too - a favourite site was the cloister of Santa Chiara, which has tiled columns and tiled benches alongside the paths, with scenes of rural life that are very charming.
It is a cool, peaceful oasis away from the busy traffic of the city centre.
The weather was perfect - sunny, warm but not too hot. And we had some very good meals - some pizzas, of course, but also very good fish. A great holiday.